These complaints are on hold...
Trying to weed through the Level 1 and 2 complaints first.
More on Deck ...
Embedded Files
SELLER AGENT FRAUD (Case XXXX) - - Canary et al v Weinstein
Seeking $250,000 in Compensatory Damages, $1,250,000 in Punitive Damages and other Economic and Non-Economic Damages (NOTE: Compensatory and Punitive overlap with claims against others and will only be collected 1x)
Fraud 50+ counts / Personal Injury
Defendant, Kent Weinstein was a Seller's Agent of Residential Property in Monterey County CA. Weinstein and his Seller, Micah Forstein engaged in a fix up and disclosure fraud scheme.. They attempted to take advantage of long standing confusion in state wide contracts and a network of Attorneys willing to protect those who attempted fraud
Details
Details
Canary v Weinstein ( Folder public pvt )
Summons (1 page) view
Cover Sheet (2 pages) view
Complaint (56 pages) view draft
Complaint Exhibits
A1.1 ) Causes of Action - Fraud- 50+ counts view
A1.2 ) Scope of Duty / Selection of Vendors - KW Disclosure Doc (1 page) view
A2) Disclosure Info Advisory - CAR Disclosure doc (DIA) (3 pages) view
A3) Seller Advisory regarding TDS - Keller Williams (2 pages) view
A4) Incomplete SPQ , Sellers AVID , TDS (4 pages) view
A5 ) Case Precedents - As Is Sales (11 pages) view
A6) Visuals - Bayview 14 (12 pages) view
A7) RPA Clauses 14A and 14F - Fraudulent ( 6 pages) view
A8 ) CA 1102 vs RPA clauses (12 pages) view
A9) Visual - As Is Sales (2 page) view
A10) Visual - Jue v Smiser - Representation Stmt Period Diagram (1 page) view
A11) Visual - Supposed to v Actual - As Is Sale (2 pages) view
A12) 2011/2019 presentations to CA BAR - Jue v Smiser (5 pages) view
A13) 8 Tiers of Fraud (2 pages) view
A14) Case Precedents - Agent/Broker Fraud (9 pages) view
Status
Status
4/30/2024 - printed....
TBD - Service...
SELLER BROKER FRAUD (Case XXXX) - - Canary et al v Von Kaenel
Seeking $250,000 in Compensatory Damages, $1,250,000 in Punitive Damages and other Economic and Non-Economic Damages (NOTE: Compensatory and Punitive overlap with claims against others and will only be collected 1x)
Fraud 50+ counts / Personal Injury
Defendant, Mark Von Kaenel was the Broker Owner/Operator of Keller Williams Coastal Estates in Carmel CA in spring of 2021. He was one of two responsible Brokers for a sale gone wrong via the behavior of Seller's Agent Kent Weinstein and his Seller, Micah Forstein. They engaged in a fix up and disclosure fraud scheme. They attempted to take advantage of long standing confusion in state wide contracts and a network of Attorneys willing to protect those who attempted fraud. Von Kaenel and his office policies helped established a playing field for fraud and he failed to properly supervise the transaction.
Details
Details
Canary v Von Kaenel ( Folder public pvt )
Summons (1 page) view
Cover Sheet (2 pages) view
Complaint (49 pages) view draft
Complaint Exhibits
A1 ) Causes of Action - Fraud- 50+ counts view
A2 ) Case Precedents - As Is Sales (11 pages) view
A3) Case Precedents - Agent/Broker Fraud (9 pages) view
A4) Incomplete SPQ , Sellers AVID , TDS (4 pages) view
A5) RPA Clauses 14A and 14F - Fraudulent ( 6 pages) view
A6) Visuals - Bayview 14 (12 pages) view
A7) Visual - Jue v Smiser - Representation Stmt Period Diagram (1 page) view
A8) Visual - Supposed to v Actual - As Is Sale (2 pages) view
A9) 8 Tiers of Fraud (2 pages) view
A10 ) List of other Exhibits Available view
Status
Status
5/1/2024 - in draft...
TBD - Service...
SELLER BROKER FRAUD (Case XXXX) - - Canary et al v Butson
Seeking $250,000 in Compensatory Damages, $1,250,000 in Punitive Damages and other Economic and Non-Economic Damages (NOTE: Compensatory and Punitive overlap with claims against others and will only be collected 1x)
Fraud 50+ counts / Personal Injury
Defendant, Mike Butson was the Managing Broker of Keller Williams Coastal Estates in Carmel CA in spring of 2021. He was one of two responsible Brokers for a sale gone wrong via the behavior of Seller's Agent Kent Weinstein and his Seller, Micah Forstein. They engaged in a fix up and disclosure fraud scheme. They attempted to take advantage of long standing confusion in state wide contracts and a network of Attorneys willing to protect those who attempted fraud. Butson and his office policies helped established a playing field for fraud and he failed to properly supervise the transaction.
Details
Details
Canary v Butson ( Folder public pvt )
Summons (1 page) view
Cover Sheet (2 pages) view
Complaint (49 pages) view draft
Complaint Exhibits
A1 ) Causes of Action - Fraud- 50+ counts view
A2 ) Case Precedents - As Is Sales (11 pages) view
A3) Case Precedents - Agent/Broker Fraud (9 pages) view
A4) Incomplete SPQ , Sellers AVID , TDS (4 pages) view
A5) RPA Clauses 14A and 14F - Fraudulent ( 6 pages) view
A6) Visuals - Bayview 14 (12 pages) view
A7) Visual - Jue v Smiser - Representation Stmt Period Diagram (1 page) view
A8) Visual - Supposed to v Actual - As Is Sale (2 pages) view
A9) 8 Tiers of Fraud (2 pages) view
A10 ) List of other Exhibits Available view
Status
Status
5/1/2024 -in draft....
TBD - Service...
A Monterey Bay Transaction Gone Wrong...
A Monterey Bay Transaction Gone Wrong...
Page updated
Report abuse